Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Goodness Community

 
(78 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Data Universe is growing
===Good for the Planet & for the Wellbeing of all life on Earth ===
Split Doing Good into multiple areas:
We are facing huge challenges related to the wellbeing of us as humans, or life on earth in general and the condition of the whole planet. We have come to the point that, according to some, the survival of the Human species is at stake.
* Good for Wellbeing
** Worker Wellbeing
** Animal wellbeing (animal farming)
** [[Consumer/User Wellbeing]]
* Good for Planet
**[[Emissions|Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]
**[[Circularity]]
*Water Polution
**[[Plastics|Plastics]]


===Legal & Regulatory===
So things have to change, we need to stop the destructive way we are living and operating our businesses today. We have to move towards true [[circularity]]. Meaning that all stakeholders need to start making the right or the better choice. But what is the better choice? And is there something like the "universal" best choice? Plus in every point of choice you should be able to compare the options to make the decision what to buy or to consume.  
* [https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/corporate-sustainability-reporting_en GS Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)]
* [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:9d2e47d1-b0f3-11ec-83e1-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
EU Strategy for sustainable and circular fashion industry]


===Other sections===
That choice highly depends on reliable, relevant and accurate data available to all stakeholders, across the entire value network. This requires a common communication language, which is missing today. Resulting in the fact that doing good, or claiming to do better is often just marketing. Plus it is hard to compare claims and certifications. Is "Planet proof" better, the same, or different then "FairTrade" or "Organic"? 
* [[Goodness Events]]
* [[Organizations and NGOs]]
* [[Solution Providers]]
* [[Local_Initiatives|Local initiatives]]


===Topics place holders===
Our goal is to define a set of acceptable interchangeable indicators which can be used at every point of choice. From defining the Goodness strategy by the board, to extending the business case (financial driven) to the Goodness case (Why is this project good for the business, wellbeing and the planet?) and providing trustworthy data to customers/consumers to help them make the better choice.
*Climate
*Energy
*Air
*Land, soil, terrestrial ecosystems
*Water
*Resource Conservation
*Transport
*Agriculture and forestry
*Private households and consumption
*Environment and economy


https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/data/environmental-indicators
This website was created to have a starting point for identifying and defining all dimensions related to sustainability. We divided sustainability into 3 types of sustainability: Environmental sustainability, social sustainability and economic sustainability. Of each type of sustainability is explained what the threads are and the cause and effect of these threads.
* [[Environmental sustainability]]
* [[Social sustainability]]
* [[Economic sustainability]]
 
== Industry themes and initiatives ==
* [[Agriculture]], animal & crop farming
* [[Fashion]], apparel & sportswear
* Cosmetics
 
== Goodness related IT & Data solutions ==
* [https://imde.io Interoperable Modular Data Exchange framework - IMDE]
* [[Measuring Goodness]]
 
== Uncategorized ==
Placeholder for all topics that are not yet processed: [[Uncategorized]]

Latest revision as of 14:00, 7 March 2023

Good for the Planet & for the Wellbeing of all life on Earth

We are facing huge challenges related to the wellbeing of us as humans, or life on earth in general and the condition of the whole planet. We have come to the point that, according to some, the survival of the Human species is at stake.

So things have to change, we need to stop the destructive way we are living and operating our businesses today. We have to move towards true circularity. Meaning that all stakeholders need to start making the right or the better choice. But what is the better choice? And is there something like the "universal" best choice? Plus in every point of choice you should be able to compare the options to make the decision what to buy or to consume.

That choice highly depends on reliable, relevant and accurate data available to all stakeholders, across the entire value network. This requires a common communication language, which is missing today. Resulting in the fact that doing good, or claiming to do better is often just marketing. Plus it is hard to compare claims and certifications. Is "Planet proof" better, the same, or different then "FairTrade" or "Organic"?

Our goal is to define a set of acceptable interchangeable indicators which can be used at every point of choice. From defining the Goodness strategy by the board, to extending the business case (financial driven) to the Goodness case (Why is this project good for the business, wellbeing and the planet?) and providing trustworthy data to customers/consumers to help them make the better choice.

This website was created to have a starting point for identifying and defining all dimensions related to sustainability. We divided sustainability into 3 types of sustainability: Environmental sustainability, social sustainability and economic sustainability. Of each type of sustainability is explained what the threads are and the cause and effect of these threads.

Industry themes and initiatives

Goodness related IT & Data solutions

Uncategorized

Placeholder for all topics that are not yet processed: Uncategorized